It's interesting that all the folks that are buying it don't know they are reading a children's book.-- Flannery O'Connor, on Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird.
Monday, July 05, 2010
One-sentence book review
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Another proud member of the irony-based community.
It's interesting that all the folks that are buying it don't know they are reading a children's book.-- Flannery O'Connor, on Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird.
"Mysterious Jackson area lawyer's blog about history, literature, and whatever irks him." -- NMC
"Just a hypersensitive pantywaist probably of Gallic descent who still suffers nightmares over what Gaius Julius did to your people 2,000 years ago." -- Kingfish
And therefore, reader, I myself am the subject of my book; it is not reasonable that you should employ your leisure on a topic so frivolous and so vain.
-- Montaigne, Essays, "To the Reader.""I shall see myself, I shall read myself, I shall go into ecstacies, and I shall ask -- Is it possible that I have so much ésprit?"
-- Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols.... the torturer has become – like the pirate and slave trader before him – hostis humani generis, an enemy of all mankind.
-- Filártiga v. Peña-Irala, 630 F.2d 876, 890 (2d Cir. 1980)
If the person that wrote that WSJ piece thinks Carson McCullers has Harper Lee beat, I'm not sure he's read much Carson McCullers.
ReplyDeleteI have trouble arguing with Flannery O'Connor's estimation, but I've no problem with a book succeeding as what it is. Tom Sawyer is a children's book, too.
What to do with a book that has such a huge moral influence, which this one did? (When I was a forth grader, roughly, my mother had me stay up late to watch Srgt York, and my parents took me to a drive in where I saw To Kill A Mockingbird, which was newly released. I can't overstate what it was like for a small-town-southern-lawyer's kid to see that movie, at a time when small towns in the south were far more like 1930ish than they were in the 1980ish my kids grew up in, much less now. But if I had to describe my moral upbringing, it would be Srgt York, To Kill A Mockingbird, Mark Twain and something-I'm-not-sure-what from The Once And Future King. So... what's the problem with that book?)
I frequently browse the Amazon teen bestsellers to buy books for my children, rising fifth and sixth graders. The recently issued "The Help," showed up as a children's or teen's best seller long before it hit the adult list. "The Book Thief," was issued in Australia as an adult book but marketed in the U.S. as a juvenile cover. It is a good book, regardless of what it is labeled. How would you label Mark Twain's "Tom Sawyer"?
ReplyDeleteI realize you are just passing on a funny quote, but this trend towards bashing "To Kill a Mockingbird," started recently by Malcolm Glidewell, is pretty sad in my view.
Books with huge moral influences frequently *are* children's books, because that's when we're most susceptible to moral influence.
ReplyDeleteFunny NMC mentions The Once and Future King, because that book *was* a "huge moral influence" on me, a pernicious one some would say. White's treatment of the Arthur-Guenever-Lancelot triangle made morality seem a lot more difficult, and a lot more open to tolerance and error, than some would have it.
And yes, Rebelyell, my main interest in the quote was my sense that I could hear O'Connor drawling it out.