The supreme court has held that there is no requirement that an expert use magical language in his testimony ....Vanlandingham v. Patton, Miss. Ct. App. June 1, 2010.
... Myself, I would've been more afraid that it was error to *admit* magical language. I feel sure that magical language would never have been admitted under the Frye standard!
... I sincerely hope for your sake, Gentle Reader, that you need to click this link to have the post title explained to you.