"Anál nathrach, orth’ bháis’s bethad, to a reasonable degree of magical certainty"

The supreme court has held that there is no requirement that an expert use magical language in his testimony ....

Vanlandingham v. Patton, Miss. Ct. App. June 1, 2010.

... Myself, I would've been more afraid that it was error to *admit* magical language. I feel sure that magical language would never have been admitted under the Frye standard!

... I sincerely hope for your sake, Gentle Reader, that you need to click this link to have the post title explained to you.