Thursday, March 17, 2011
So apparently we're going to war?
Just so you know. Sullivan wonders "by what authority" can Obama commit forces on the strength of a UN resolution? Ask Harry Truman.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Another proud member of the irony-based community.
"Mysterious Jackson area lawyer's blog about history, literature, and whatever irks him." -- NMC
"Just a hypersensitive pantywaist probably of Gallic descent who still suffers nightmares over what Gaius Julius did to your people 2,000 years ago." -- Kingfish
And therefore, reader, I myself am the subject of my book; it is not reasonable that you should employ your leisure on a topic so frivolous and so vain.
-- Montaigne, Essays, "To the Reader.""I shall see myself, I shall read myself, I shall go into ecstacies, and I shall ask -- Is it possible that I have so much ésprit?"
-- Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols.... the torturer has become – like the pirate and slave trader before him – hostis humani generis, an enemy of all mankind.
-- Filártiga v. Peña-Irala, 630 F.2d 876, 890 (2d Cir. 1980)
I'm horribly conflicted about this one (review prior reactions at the time-- Iraq? 100% opposed. Afganistan? Viewed it as arguable, was not opposed but dubious about planning and then thought it clearly fouled up. Gulf War I? Thought we bailed on people we'd given reason to hope and let them get massacred). But I have the feeling of watching the tanks roll in to Hungary in 1958 or on the Czechs a decade later and find it unbearably sad.
ReplyDeleteWe can't be set up to solve every issue by military force. But I am going to have trouble watching this evil man crush this while no one does anything.
That's kinda how I feel on this one, and I think it made sense to go the UN route.
ReplyDeleteStill, it's rather dumbfounding how we've essentially backed into a war. Maybe the UN's pressure will knock out enough of Qaddafi's props that he decides it's Game Over, and we won't be sending ground troops. Maybe.