Monday, March 02, 2009

An appeal that sucked?

It may seem odd to sue someone for not sucking, but when it's Oreck suing Dyson over vacuum cleaner adverts, it all makes sense.
Oreck alleged that Dyson falsely advertised that its vacuum cleaners do not lose suction ....
The Fifth Circuit affirms the dismissal of Oreck's claims in an otherwise forgettable opinion that doesn't even tell us who sucks more, Oreck or Dyson.

(I was studying a Dyson machine in Target last night, having been struggling with my dad's sucks-for-not-sucking Hoover earlier in the day, but I still cannot join the ranks of those who pay $400+ for a vacuum cleaner. No matter how much it sucks.)

No comments:

Post a Comment